Ethereum 
$4,160.55co-founder of Vitalik Buterinsocial platform on October 16 Warpcast Bitcoin in his post on 
$112,758.61 He described the maximalists’ views as reflections of bygone ideas. Buterin said, “Reading the posts of some Bitcoin maximalists is like traveling to a time when most people still cling to ideas that they have long understood to be wrong.”
Buteri’s Critical Look at Bitcoin Maximalism
Buterin, Bitcoin maximalismHe is one of the names that have been criticizing for a long time. According to him, dogmatic views that Bitcoin will replace the entire financial system ignore the current dynamics of the digital economy. This time, in his comment on Warpcast, he pointed out that ideas that are “detached from reality” are still alive on social media.
Buterin’s emphasis Bitcoin It is based on criticism from its supporters, mostly based on state-owned money printing. However, the co-founder of Ethereum argued that these arguments were baseless, stating that only a small part of government revenues came from money printing.
“The real picture is that state money printing accounts for at most 10 to 20 percent of government revenues. Even if all countries were to dollarize, states could continue to have war expenditures as high as they are today,” he said. Bitcoin maximalistsHe claimed that it distorted economic realities.
Buterin’s Emphasis on Economic Reality
Buterin’s words cryptocurrency It resonated both in the world and in traditional financial circles. While his statements remind us that the idea of completely eliminating the monetary sovereignty of states is exaggerated, they point out that the integration of Blockchain technology into the global economy should occur in more rational ways.
The approach of Ethereum’s co-founder reflects his vision of building the future of cryptocurrencies on pragmatic, not just ideological, foundations. Buterin’s last post brought to the agenda the importance of rational thinking against the dogmatic polarizations that still exist in the cryptocurrency world.
Many analysts consider Buterin’s move as a symbol of the transition from technological idealism to economic reality. This approach reinforces the global trend that cryptocurrencies should not only be financial instruments but also a balanced part of the socioeconomic system.
