Altcoin Solana In the community, heated debates on how the network will determine the future inflation rates, while Galaxy Research came up with a remarkable proposal. Following the rejection of the previous proposal called SIMD-228, the new system aims to go beyond the classic yes/no voting. The proposal, called “Multiple Election Stake-Weight Aggregation (MESA), aims to reflect the views of the community in a wider range and more transparently. According to the Galaxy Research, instead of trying to compromise on a single suggestion, seeing the preferences of the community and unifying an average decision is a much more efficient way. The purpose of the new system is both Left coin Reduce the pressure on the supply and to soften the in -community division.
An approach beyond the traditional vote
Shift system Instead of just saying “yes” or “no, to verifiers, it offers a series of options mainly voting. In this system, participants can vote by specifying the inflation rates they support. The final decision is shaped according to the weighted average of these rates.
According to Galaxy Research SIMD-228 The reason for the failure in his vote was that the community could not clearly reflect these disagreements of the existing system even though the community wanted to change in the same direction. The SIMD-228 was a design that proposes to dynamically adjust the coin supply according to Stinging participation and offers a deflationist model. However, despite the high participation, the proposal was not accepted due to the polarization of the views within the community.
MESA proposes to progress by maintaining an annual 15 percent of inflation decrease in each EPOCH in the current system. Currently, Solana’s inflation rate is 4.6 percent, while 64.7 percent of the total supply are stacked. This table indicates that the participants should be more active and conscious participation in the process.
Criticisms directed to Mesa and the prominent alternative suggestions
Galaxy ResearchOne of the first reactions to the proposal of the Solana -based development company Anza’s chief economist Max Resnick’ten came. Resnick argued that Mesa was technically complex and that they may have difficulty understanding how the participants should vote. According to him, people often tend to vote at extremes to reach the value they prefer, which can disrupt the balance of the system.
Resnick still thinks that the Dynamic, market-based supply model offered by the SIMD-228 is safer and costly in terms of cost. But he acknowledges that the voting of the community over wider options can reduce the polarization. He stated that traditional yes/no systems devote people to opposing camps and make the real focus point a “win”.
Solana Labs Founding Partner Anatoly Yakovenko and offered a different solution proposal. He suggested the use of stake -weighted media instead of the weighted average. This method may reduce the risk of shift to the average and achieve a more representative result. Yakovenko’s approach was technically simpler and can reduce the confusion in the community because it received the support of the community.
Responsibility Rejection: The information contained in this article does not contain investment advice. Investors should be aware that crypto currencies carry high volatility and thus risk and carry out their operations in line with their own research.
